consumer protection law造句
1. As consumer, patient should be protected by consumer protection law.
2. China's "Consumer Protection Law" Article 49 legislation is imperfect, leading to the "fraud", "known to buy fake fake" hassle-free.
3. In 1993, The Consumer Protection Law firstly defines the provisions of the Double Compensation, which has been seen as creating a precedent for Punitive Damages.
4. Now, the Consumer Protection Law in amending makes a significant development to the system.
5. As soul of consumer protection law, the value of consumer protection law is of great significance to the legislation and implementation of consumer protection law.
6. Wal-Mart in Chongqing Branch behavior, violated the" PRC consumer protection law" the relevant provisions, which belongs to the consumer fraud act.
7. According to the Consumer Protection Law, the relationship between readers and public libraries is that of managers and consumers, a special service relationship.
8. Consumer Protection Law" for the protection of the right to know the imperfect;"
9. Chapter One explores whether the consumer protection law is applicable to the hospital-patient relationship.
10. At present, China has no Consumer Protection Law specialized in E-commerce.
11. The deficiency of protection by Contract Law and Consumer Protection Law in our country are mainly analyzed.
12. Aftermost, the relationship between consumer's legal duties and consumer protection law is also analyzed to locate the legal items of consumer's obligations in consumer protection system.
13. Programme S.TODAY, 21.10.93SNA A director of a bust timeshare firm has admitted breaching strict consumer protection laws.
14. Add to a new system of regret rights in the Consumer Protection Law and further the interests of consumer protection, to improve the consumer protection system has great significance.
15. Secondly based on the harmonious concept of consumption and the idea of economic law, some proposition about perfection of the legislation of extensive consumer protection law is proposed.
16. The Supreme Court disagreed in Wyeth v. Levine on March 4, 2009. By a 6-to-3 vote, the Court ruled that federal approval of a drug does not "preempt," or override, a state's consumer protection law.