快好知 kuaihz

求翻译 | What weve been getting wrong about choosing

source:digest.bps.org.uk

欲翻译的小伙伴,可评论『领稿』,并把完成的译文发在自己的心理圈里。谢谢

Buying a gift can feel like a test. You want the gift to show how thoughtful you"ve been, and how you"ve taken the recipient"s interests and personality into account. Yet according to the authors of a new psychology paper, this isn"t the optimal approach. You and the recipient will likely feel closer to one another if you buy them a gift that says something about you, not them.

Lara Aknin and Lauren Human began by confirming their suspicions: hundreds of people surveyed online said that when buying gifts, they prefer to choose an item or experience that reflects the personality and interests of the person they are giving to. Similarly, people mostly said that they preferred receiving gifts that were tailored to their tastes and personality. Other survey participants were asked to recall recent gift-giving and receiving experiences, and in line with the findings for preferences, they said that, yes, they mostly gave and received gifts that were recipient-centric.

However, contrary to this received wisdom, Aknin and Human reasoned that giving a gift that reveals something of your own true self could be more effective at increasing relationship closeness because it"s an act of personal disclosure. We already know from past research that sharing intimacies with others – our private thoughts and feelings – is a powerful relationship catalyst. The researchers are suggesting that giving a gift that reveals something of your self can have a similar effect. 

They put this to the test by recruiting 78 participants at a shopping mall before Mother"s Day. Half the participants agreed to buy a card for their mother that "reveals your true self", the other half bought a card that "reveals your knowledge of the recipient". After they"d bought the card, the participants who"d chosen one that reflected their true self said they felt closer to their mother than the control participants who did the conventional thing and bought a card that reflected their knowledge of their mother.

Next, the researchers recruited over a hundred students to choose a musical track on iTunes to give to a friend, relative or romantic partner. Half of them were instructed to choose a track that "reveals your true self"; the others did the conventional thing and chose a track that "reveals your knowledge of the recipient". This time the choice strategy didn"t make any difference to how close the gift-givers felt to the recipient. But when the researchers contacted the recipients, those who received a track that revealed something of the giver"s interests and passions, said they felt closer to the giver, as compared to the control participants who"d received a track that was supposed to reveal something about themselves.

The researchers said their findings have practical implications. "... [P]eople may well be advised to offer more self-reflective gifts if building stronger social connections is the underlying goal," they wrote. Further analysis showed that recipient-centric music tracks could be as effective as giver-centric tracks at promoting feelings of closeness, but this seemed partly to depend on the giver"s success at choosing an appropriate track.

This last detail may help explain the mismatch between folk wisdom and the findings of this study. There"s a cultural expectation and preference for giving recipient-centric gifts, but it"s often not easy to choose a gift that accurately reflects the recipient"s true self, and a mistaken choice can go awry if it signals how little you actually know the recipient, especially if you"re giving to a man.

You could try simply asking what the recipient would like, but if that"s not possible or appealing, these new results show the effectiveness of choosing a gift that reflects your own self. By doing so you are showing the courage to share a slice of yourself with the recipient. The researchers acknowledged that more research is needed to confirm the truth of this. In particular, be warned their data say nothing of the long-term effects of repeatedly giving giver-centric gifts! In fact, they warned that doing so could backfire "because it could signal self-obsession or narcissism!"

References

Aknin, L., & Human, L. (2015). Give a piece of you: Gifts that reflect givers promote closeness Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 8-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.04.006 

本站资源来自互联网,仅供学习,如有侵权,请通知删除,敬请谅解!
搜索建议:choosing  choosing词条  翻译  翻译词条  getting  getting词条  about  about词条  wrong  wrong词条  
综合

 我们每天都要微笑的十个理由

 微笑是一个可以让你脱颖而出的好办法,同时它也可以让你的身体更好地运作。微笑让你变得更健康、更能抵抗压力和让你更有魅力。微笑理由之一,它是让你活得更加长久的快乐...(展开)

综合

 80后为什么比我们那时还艰难

昨天晚上,与同事吃饭。回办公室后,发了一条微博:春节前同事们聚餐,不少孩子散席后都返回租住的房间,打听了一下,都挺贵的,单位附近的一居室要三千多元。如果不是家里...(展开)

综合

 与悲观情绪隔离的10个技巧

如果你看到半杯水,会有什么想法?悲观的人认为“只有半杯水了。”,而乐观的人却认为“还有半杯水呢!”如何拥有积极乐观的情绪呢?以下10个技巧帮助我们与悲观情绪说再...(展开)